I’m writing this for the Thinking Homeschoolers thingamabob. The subject is:
Relative to the services that you receive from government, do you think you pay too much in taxes? Explain.
Geez. That sounds almost like an essay question, and I hate essay questions. How about a nice multiple choice instead:
Relative to the services that you receive from government, do you think you pay too much in taxes?
A. Yes
B. No
C. Not Sure.
D. Sometimes.
There. My answer is D. And I didn’t even have to scribble an outline in the margin and get a hand cramp from writing furiously for 50 minutes.
But I guess this is supposed to be for thinking homeschoolers, and that didn’t require much thinking, so perhaps I should explain. But before I go any further with this, I should disclose right up front that I work in state government here in Iowa. My entire salary and benefits come from your tax dollars. I work for the Medicaid program, which is jointly state and federally administered, which means part of my salary comes from federal funds so even if you don’t live in Iowa, you’re paying me. Thanks. I appreciate it.
So my perspective might be a little different than yours. Taxes are a mixed bag. Essentially, you’re required to pay your taxes and you’re supposed to get certain services and benefits in return. Do you get what you pay for? Well, yes and no.
Let’s start at a high level. Right now the U.S. is paying big bucks to fight a war in Iraq that never should have happened in the first place. As I write this, we’ve spent over $511,000,000,000 on this war, and what have we received in return? Four-thousand dead American military personnel; between 80,000 - 90,000 dead Iraqi civilians; and increased terrorism in the mideast, just to name a few. But that doesn’t mean that I think all of our military spending is a waste of taxpayer money. Our military provides a valuable service. We need them to defend our homeland and we should be using them against the real terrorist threat.
OK, enough about that. Next up: education. This is one of those things that can vary from state to state or even from school district to school district. There are public schools out there that have great facilities, great teachers, and where the students can receive a great education. And there are also many public schools that are falling apart, have crappy teachers, and do a poor job of educating kids. Is this fair? Shouldn’t quality education be a priority for all children, no matter what school district they happen to live in? With the current state of education, some people are getting their money’s worth, but many others aren’t. There are also people out there who think they can do a better job of educating their own children than their local public school. They call us homeschoolers. We still pay taxes that support the school system, even though we don’t get anything in return. That’s OK, I’d rather them have my money than to have to do it their way.
What’s next? Healthcare. Our taxes pay for Medicare for the elderly, and Medicaid for the poor and disabled. I don’t fit into any of those groups (although I’m getting poorer all the time), so I don’t get anything from those tax dollars either (not counting my above-mentioned salary). But the whole point of these programs is to provide coverage for those who can’t afford it on their own and don’t have it through an employer. Unlike education, this is a system that is purposefully and inherently unbalanced. It’s that way because we have collectively made a decision that it is a worthwhile thing to do. No, healthcare is not a right, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t decide to pay for everyone to have it.
So where do I think I get my money’s worth? How about roads? I’ve traveled on roads all over the US and with only a few exceptions, found the roads to be pretty decent. Des Moines used to have a horrible freeway system with all kinds of weird stuff like entrance ramps that merge on the left and places where the entrance and exit ramps merged with each other within a space of maybe 20 yards. The metro area just finished a 5 year project that basically rebuilt the entire freeway system, including all the bridges. They did it with minimal disruption to traffic because they had really good project management. The whole thing actually finished on schedule. I was impressed with the job the DOT did on the project. Now if they can just do something about the drivers…
Also on a local note, our public works department in Altoona does a pretty good job. Every time it snowed this winter (and that was a lot) our street was plowed before I left for work in the morning. They also spray for mosquitoes all the time. I mean it’s so often that I sometimes start to worry that they’re trying to poison us. But hardly a mosquito dared to show itself last summer.
Oh yeah, and parks. We’ve been to a number of places run by the National Park Service and have never been disappointed. We’ve been to Rocky Mountain National Park dozens of times, Mammoth Cave, the Great Sand Dunes, Sleeping Bear Dunes, Hot Springs, the Grand Canyon (Chris and I separately when were were younger), plus a number of other National Historic Landmarks (like the Alamo and the St. Augustine Historic District to name a couple). They’ve all been well managed, and provided lots of educational opportunities. For the small amount of taxes that go to the National Parks, what you get in return is a bargain.
I’m sure I could go one with more examples of both the good and the bad, but you get the point. Simply saying whether or not you pay too much taxes is an oversimplification.
The problem, in my mind, is that we don’t get to decide the degree to which our tax money supports these various things. Here’s a novel idea. Wouldn’t it be cool if each year when you do your taxes, you could designate what area of the federal budget your your tax dollars would be allocated to? It could be done by percentage. Think we need a strong military, but you don’t want to give up your Medicare part D prescription benefits? Designate 70% for the Pentagon, and 30% to Health and Human Services. Convinced we need to spend more on education, but also want to support the space program and make sure you have something to retire on? Designate 33% each to Education, NASA, and Social Security.
If you could really do that, and the Federal government was required to use the aggregate amounts as budget allocations, what would you support?